<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hopeless but not serious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oonae.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:28:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Misc by DN</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/misc-5/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>DN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=587#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>To think, I missed the &quot;Oona as Faculty Resident&quot; Era by only a few years. So sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To think, I missed the &#8220;Oona as Faculty Resident&#8221; Era by only a few years. So sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal by Natty</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/scandal/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Natty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=589#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>This would seem rather a professional use of gossip to my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would seem rather a professional use of gossip to my eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal by Kyla</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/scandal/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=589#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>Wow, and wow. I wish only to mark my ambivalence about the social uses of gossip.

--K</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, and wow. I wish only to mark my ambivalence about the social uses of gossip.</p>
<p>&#8211;K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal by oonae</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/scandal/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>oonae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=589#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>Oh.  Got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh.  Got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal by Nina</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/scandal/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=589#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;MFG&quot; means the author of the blog post, not the author of the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;MFG&#8221; means the author of the blog post, not the author of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal by oonae</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/scandal/#comment-1170</link>
		<dc:creator>oonae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=589#comment-1170</guid>
		<description>@Clare, thanks.  I&#039;m grateful for the further information and delighted that Ms. Viebeck has been honoured outside the bubble if she cannot be adequately honoured here at home.

@MFG, I have never met Petropoulos and know nothing of him except what I&#039;ve recently read.

@meg, I *do* apologize!  Circumspect Meg knew.  I was looking for the widespread, general awareness that the story deserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Clare, thanks.  I&#8217;m grateful for the further information and delighted that Ms. Viebeck has been honoured outside the bubble if she cannot be adequately honoured here at home.</p>
<p>@MFG, I have never met Petropoulos and know nothing of him except what I&#8217;ve recently read.</p>
<p>@meg, I *do* apologize!  Circumspect Meg knew.  I was looking for the widespread, general awareness that the story deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal by meg</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/scandal/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=589#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>Hey, you know very well you&#039;re exaggerating about &quot;no one&quot; at Pomona knowing about it.  Does &quot;almost no one&quot; stink up your mouth too much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you know very well you&#8217;re exaggerating about &#8220;no one&#8221; at Pomona knowing about it.  Does &#8220;almost no one&#8221; stink up your mouth too much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misc by meg</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/misc-5/#comment-1168</link>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=587#comment-1168</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it reaches character-flaw level until you&#039;ve shown her how to reexamine her assumptions a couple of times and *then* she&#039;s still unable.  Working backwards to find the flaw is just as much a trick as grepping &quot;of&quot; to find all the noxious nominalizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it reaches character-flaw level until you&#8217;ve shown her how to reexamine her assumptions a couple of times and *then* she&#8217;s still unable.  Working backwards to find the flaw is just as much a trick as grepping &#8220;of&#8221; to find all the noxious nominalizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal by MFG</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/scandal/#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator>MFG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=589#comment-1167</guid>
		<description>Elise Viebeck did an incredible job, she is a grand person as well,  her journalism is A1 and there is no denying that.  However I think the author of this story has a personal vindetta against Jonathan Petropolous....

True and good journalism like Elise Viebeck&#039;s reporting  is not based on biased and a thorn in the side type journalism.
This writer, although some of the questions are still unanswered and perhaps worth knowing answers to, goes about it with a vengenance - which is not good. 

More interesting, more reader worthy would be to delve deeper, to find new points, new facts and there are quite some interesting ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elise Viebeck did an incredible job, she is a grand person as well,  her journalism is A1 and there is no denying that.  However I think the author of this story has a personal vindetta against Jonathan Petropolous&#8230;.</p>
<p>True and good journalism like Elise Viebeck&#8217;s reporting  is not based on biased and a thorn in the side type journalism.<br />
This writer, although some of the questions are still unanswered and perhaps worth knowing answers to, goes about it with a vengenance &#8211; which is not good. </p>
<p>More interesting, more reader worthy would be to delve deeper, to find new points, new facts and there are quite some interesting ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scandal by Clare</title>
		<link>http://oonae.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/scandal/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oonae.wordpress.com/?p=589#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>For a quick education on the Pissarro Affair, read the remarkable archive of Claremont Insider blog posts from March to May 2008. Although the anonymous local blogger known as &quot;Claremont Buzz&quot; seems to have gone silent as of August 2009, he followed this issue avidly as it began spilling into the 5C community. His blog was widely read in the international art community and by journalists, etc. To see every entry he wrote, find a Claremont Insider article and click on the &quot;Jonathan Petropoulos&quot; tag (at bottom); tagged articles come up in reverse chronological order.

It is not true that Viebeck was never honored. Her brave reporting -- which has never been refuted by Petropoulos or the Art Loss Register -- won the $10,000 Breindel Prize, a prestigious college journalism award which also includes media internships. Viebeck&#039;s photograph even appeared in the New York Post with a short article. Sadly, it is true that CMC and its PR team assiduously avoided Viebeck&#039;s Breindel honor, even though a (male) CMC recipient one year before her earned lavish praise in CMC publications.

The world is not fair, but you knew that. 

The 1903 Pissarro, restituted to the Fischer family after decades in Bruno Lohse&#039;s secret safe, was rechristened &quot;Quai Malaquais et l&#039;Institut&quot; for the purpose of its recent sale at Christie&#039;s. The painting&#039;s new title may have been a subtle nod to the institutional aspect of the scandal that surrounds it. Although the first auction at Christie&#039;s, London last May was halted by a last-minute inheritance dispute, after resolution, the painting sold for $2.1 million (and some change) at Christie&#039;s, New York on Nov. 3rd, 2009.

There&#039;s a rumor that Peter Griebert -- recipient of Petropoulos&#039; email -- made a modest donation to CMC&#039;s Holocaust Institute a few years ago, and that Griebert even visited the campus and met President Gann at a special college reception. CMC quietly returned Griebert&#039;s donation at the end of the 2007-2008 academic year, but to date has taken no further action related to the scandal. Griebert&#039;s father knew Bruno Lohse very well since their student days together, and some say he fenced hundreds of paintings for Lohse after the war. Did his son continued the practice? And did Jonathan Petropoulos really not know that the Gestapo-looted Pissarro he photographed in a Zurich bank in January 2007 was connected to Lohse? And what about the long list of paintings which left Lohse&#039;s safe in recent years? It&#039;s all part of an ongoing investigation in Europe, they say, and we may wait years before we hear more. If we hear any more at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a quick education on the Pissarro Affair, read the remarkable archive of Claremont Insider blog posts from March to May 2008. Although the anonymous local blogger known as &#8220;Claremont Buzz&#8221; seems to have gone silent as of August 2009, he followed this issue avidly as it began spilling into the 5C community. His blog was widely read in the international art community and by journalists, etc. To see every entry he wrote, find a Claremont Insider article and click on the &#8220;Jonathan Petropoulos&#8221; tag (at bottom); tagged articles come up in reverse chronological order.</p>
<p>It is not true that Viebeck was never honored. Her brave reporting &#8212; which has never been refuted by Petropoulos or the Art Loss Register &#8212; won the $10,000 Breindel Prize, a prestigious college journalism award which also includes media internships. Viebeck&#8217;s photograph even appeared in the New York Post with a short article. Sadly, it is true that CMC and its PR team assiduously avoided Viebeck&#8217;s Breindel honor, even though a (male) CMC recipient one year before her earned lavish praise in CMC publications.</p>
<p>The world is not fair, but you knew that. </p>
<p>The 1903 Pissarro, restituted to the Fischer family after decades in Bruno Lohse&#8217;s secret safe, was rechristened &#8220;Quai Malaquais et l&#8217;Institut&#8221; for the purpose of its recent sale at Christie&#8217;s. The painting&#8217;s new title may have been a subtle nod to the institutional aspect of the scandal that surrounds it. Although the first auction at Christie&#8217;s, London last May was halted by a last-minute inheritance dispute, after resolution, the painting sold for $2.1 million (and some change) at Christie&#8217;s, New York on Nov. 3rd, 2009.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a rumor that Peter Griebert &#8212; recipient of Petropoulos&#8217; email &#8212; made a modest donation to CMC&#8217;s Holocaust Institute a few years ago, and that Griebert even visited the campus and met President Gann at a special college reception. CMC quietly returned Griebert&#8217;s donation at the end of the 2007-2008 academic year, but to date has taken no further action related to the scandal. Griebert&#8217;s father knew Bruno Lohse very well since their student days together, and some say he fenced hundreds of paintings for Lohse after the war. Did his son continued the practice? And did Jonathan Petropoulos really not know that the Gestapo-looted Pissarro he photographed in a Zurich bank in January 2007 was connected to Lohse? And what about the long list of paintings which left Lohse&#8217;s safe in recent years? It&#8217;s all part of an ongoing investigation in Europe, they say, and we may wait years before we hear more. If we hear any more at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
